Page 14 of 21

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2005 2:43 pm
by Lisk
Max wrote:They need to be sure that every developer can check the code.
Yeah, that's kinda bad you can't see their almost perfect code.

A regular user, however doesn't need it.

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 12:33 am
by Max
Lisk wrote:A regular user, however doesn't need it.
Yes he does, because regular users hate spywares and backdoors...

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:53 pm
by Lisk
I don't need the source code of opera :l ?

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:12 pm
by Max
That's because you must be naive and unwise...
But you must understand that people can be different from you.

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 10:34 pm
by bangbanger
johnjg75 wrote:IE, i trust windows and their applications
You keep trusting windows then (I dont but i use it because thats what im used to)

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 5:18 pm
by Lisk
Max wrote:That's because you must be naive and unwise...
But you must understand that people can be different from you.
Well it's guaranteed to work. Unlike some free open source progz when "it should work".

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 11:48 pm
by Max
Lisk wrote:Well it's guaranteed to work.
Who guaranteed this ?
Nobody...

It's like going to a shop where you know that nobody can check what they put in the food they sell.
Do you know anybody who will buy food there ?
I don't...

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 3:08 pm
by Lisk
Um, how does that relate to Opera? They guarantee it woks.
If there was spyware it would be already detected :/

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 5:18 pm
by Max
Lisk wrote:Um, how does that relate to Opera?
Because Opera is closed source
They guarantee it woks.
Yes, and the salesman can garantee you that there's nothing bad in its food. But who can check ?
If there was spyware it would be already detected :/
How ?
The only way to detect spywares is to look at the source code...

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 3:29 pm
by MFMCLAN
opera