Page 3 of 3
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 3:31 am
by Tails5
No it's not, Vista has everything XP does and more.
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 8:11 pm
by sa3idy
look it's different between prefer and use, i prefer vista , still have some bugs but it's great and xp had alot of bugs when released , but iam use xp caus my pc is too low equip.
asap i'll change my pc and change to vista

Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:21 am
by Tails5
I'd change to Vista right now, but I can't afford it.

XP rocks...
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:44 am
by jasondsouza
i too like XP.. Its fast and bug free.. doesn't hang like previous versions of windows and moreover doesn't require super hardware like vista..
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:43 pm
by Tails5
I hate to point this out, but Vista does NOT require super hardware, even my computer atleast 4 years old, has the requirements, the only thing it doesnt have is a DVD burner, it's requirements are only
- 800MHz 32-bit or 64-bit processor
- 512MB RAM (Only 448MB if your system doesnt share RAM with graphics)
- 100% DirectX9 Compatible Video Card with atleast 32MB RAM
- 20GB Hard Drive with atleast 15GB Free(Including current OS if using an upgrade edition)
- Internet Access
- DVD Drive
- Audio Output Capability
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 1:07 pm
by thetarget
A matter of preference, XP will be my choice. I bought Vista and sold it after 3 days to another poor fella fooled by the hype. It is not stable, not 'fun' to use, not anything wellworth any $60 bucks. XP can do everything or more.
Microsoft has been keeping its best in its archive for a long long time, when are they going to release them? Are they going to cannibalise their own product again?