Flash vs HTML

toychoq · Post by **toychoq** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:16 am

SAlom bolla kamchilila yomi aaaaa FLSH ZURDE baribir
COOOL !!!!

Max · Post by **Max** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 1:06 am

Flash is heavy
Flash is not accessible
Flash is slow
Flash is proprietary

So if you need vectorial graphics, use SVG...

Lisk · Post by **Lisk** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:29 am

and we hate flash ads T.T

rabara · Post by **rabara** » Sun Jul 17, 2005 4:54 am

Flash Is Great But Overduing It Is Bad
As They Say:
Too Much Is Bad

kaca · Post by **kaca** » Wed Oct 26, 2005 3:13 pm

i think flash is easier than html to do

znad · Post by **znad** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:00 am

i think y kan convert the site to flash and but alnk in your index one to flash site athoer to HTML
the vistor will chose

uz · Post by uz » Tue Dec 27, 2005 4:38 am

first of all, if you want to be ur site interactive you are likely to use flash
however if your sites' visitors use dial-up more or likely they will have some problems with viewing your flash files coz
sometimes they use high speed internet
but html is more faster than flsh but not interactive

insane · Post by **insane** » Tue Dec 27, 2005 9:58 pm

I have a great idea! lol. Why don't you stick with html, then later if you want, make a flash version of the site. Then at the homepage let them choose which version, html or flash. That way, everyones hapy!

.illicit. · Post by **.illicit.** » Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:15 pm

I like Flash, but it is too hard to make one of those cool flash sites. So I go with HTML, more friendlier in my opinion.

Latez,

.illicit.

insane · Post by **insane** » Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:18 pm

Yeah, if you area beginner, not saying you are, stick with html.

Flash vs HTML

Flash is better than HTML