Page 4 of 5

Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 7:05 pm
by jtcandra
ddarude wrote:
jtcandra wrote:Great movie
typical Peter Jackson.
Peter Jackson .....
sounds like a canadian cigarette brand :P
You are right about that!:D
haha, first time I bought those cigs, I thought it's from the director's company or sth... LOL

Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 8:24 pm
by demoncolor
a great movie

umm

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:49 am
by bad-dj
lol well i did not like that movire but oh well

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:25 am
by Skeith Teh Murderer
It's a great movie!

Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:26 am
by Bedadenu
Its a bit long for me but it was ok. I wasn't really sure of what to expect. King Kong looked cool though.

Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 2:27 am
by afu
It's a great movie!
i like it

Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 2:28 am
by afu
Skeith Teh Murderer wrote:It's a great movie!
:lol:

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 4:14 pm
by Itaiber2000
well, this remake is not too bad, but not good either. atleast it got made by petter jackson who is a movie buff by himself. he made that version as an homge to the orginal created in 1933. but one problem, a big problem. the orginal kong was created after WWI and it's seem like WW2 maybe approting, this was the years of the great depresions and the orginal movie represent that, ofcures it got lost in the remake cos of the time of realese. and ofcurse anther problem is its too long. 3+ hours? the orginal was 80 or 90 mins long, what happend? more action sences? it's not what kong actual about. i'm disapointed from that one. i don't like remakes very much but rarly someone makes a remake that is birllianlt. i hoped that will be the case in that one, but i think that the movie studios put a lot of money into it so even the creative power that jackson got still wasnt enugh for having it is own way for 100%. its a shame.

Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 9:55 am
by mody
yes it is very good movie i seen it

Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 9:32 am
by spl
great movie