You are right about that!:Dddarude wrote:Peter Jackson .....jtcandra wrote:Great movie
typical Peter Jackson.
sounds like a canadian cigarette brand :P
haha, first time I bought those cigs, I thought it's from the director's company or sth... LOL
KING KONG
-
demoncolor
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 6:52 pm
-
Skeith Teh Murderer
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 5:25 am
-
Itaiber2000
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:44 pm
well, this remake is not too bad, but not good either. atleast it got made by petter jackson who is a movie buff by himself. he made that version as an homge to the orginal created in 1933. but one problem, a big problem. the orginal kong was created after WWI and it's seem like WW2 maybe approting, this was the years of the great depresions and the orginal movie represent that, ofcures it got lost in the remake cos of the time of realese. and ofcurse anther problem is its too long. 3+ hours? the orginal was 80 or 90 mins long, what happend? more action sences? it's not what kong actual about. i'm disapointed from that one. i don't like remakes very much but rarly someone makes a remake that is birllianlt. i hoped that will be the case in that one, but i think that the movie studios put a lot of money into it so even the creative power that jackson got still wasnt enugh for having it is own way for 100%. its a shame.
* Itai Berman *
